RUFKM?!?

UPDATE: It appears I was wrong. The original plea/diversion agreement specifically disallows Hunter Biden from owning firearms in the future. Thank dog!

If this doesn’t prove that the justice system is biased under the current administration, then you’re not paying attention:

Hunter Biden agrees to plead guilty in tax case and avoid prosecution on gun charge

Misdemeanor charges for tax evasion? With a maximum sentence of 12 months each? DIVERSION for the gun charge? Really?!?

The worst part is his diversion plea on the gun charge. Because Hunter is entering a “diversion” program for the FELONY gun charge (the same charge for which this woman will likely receive 18 – 24 months in prison), at the end of the process he will be able to have the charges dismissed. No felony conviction at all!

What does this mean? HE’LL STILL BE ABLE TO OWN GUNS!!!!

That’s right. Federal law prohibits someone from owning firearms if (this is just a partial list applicable to this case):

1) They are convicted of a crime – any crime – for which they COULD be sentenced to more than 1 year in prison (regardless of the actual sentence given). This plea deal allows Hunter to plead to a specific charge with a one year maximum sentence, preserving his right to own a firearm.

2) They are convicted of a felony – such as the gun charge here – which Biden will avoid with his “diversion” sentence when the charges are dismissed at the end of the process.

In the end, all Hunter has to do is claim that he is no longer a drug user or addict (provided there is no new laptop full of pictures to contradict him) and – Presto! Biden can once again own guns.

I repeat – RUFKM?!?

Where’d they get the guns?

Six teens have been arresting with regards to the April 15th Dadeville, Alabama shooting at a sweet-sixteen party. Three are under the age of 18. So… where’d they get the guns?

Six people – including four teenagers – have been arrested and now face murder charges in connection with the deadly rampage at a weekend Sweet 16 birthday party in Dadeville, Alabama, authorities say.

President Biden immediately called for more gun control, without acknowledging how these murderers obtained their weapons or if his proposed gun controls would have had any impact on these shootings:

In response to the shooting, President Joe Biden reiterated his calls for Congress to enact laws requiring safe storage of firearms and universal background checks, banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, and eliminating gun manufacturers’ immunity from liability.

Interestingly, the Vox article cited above includes a link to a firearms study by the NIH. It claims that higher firearm death rates are related to higher gun ownership rates. What I find interesting is the other correlations that they mentioned but did not emphasize in their report regarding race, crime rates and incarceration. Read about them in Tables 2 & 3 of the report (they are VERY interesting):

The Relationship Between Gun Ownership and Firearm Homicide Rates in the United States, 1981–2010

 

Rights? We don’t need no stinkin’ rights!

Not if this is the idea of a “right” under Gov. Whitmer:

In win for unions, Whitmer repeals Michigan’s ‘right-to-work’ law…

From the article:

“Today, we are coming together to restore workers’ rights…”

What rights are those, Gov. Whitmer? The right to be forced to pay union dues just to work in a union-dominated industry – even if you don’t agree with the union’s policies or positions? The right to financially support political speech that you find abhorrent? The right to fund the campaigns of those who voted to repeal Michigan’s right-to-work laws?

“Nearly 46,000 private sector workers covered by a collective bargaining agreement were not dues-paying union members.”

I’ll bet the unions didn’t like that one bit, now did they? But now they have their revenge. Neener, neener, neener!

Thank you, Gov. Whitmer, for restoring my “right” to pay union dues. Clearly, I was wrong. Please send me to a labor re-education camp so that I don’t make the same mistake next time. Heil Whitmer!

Explain to me again how this advances workers rights…?

Eh? Just lower the bar…!

Of course it’s unfair to expect students to show competency to graduate high school. So if we have to do it, let’s just make it easy for them. Not like having dumb kids everywhere will be a problem…

New York lowering minimum test scores for student proficiency in math, English: the ‘new normal’

If this doesn’t make the American Federation of Teachers and Randi Weingarten poster children for school choice, I don’t know what will…

But what happens…

…when only one political party or candidate makes an argument that supposedly violates Google’s “community guidelines”? How does this censorship apply equally, “…regardless of political viewpoint…”, when only one side of a topic is being silenced?

YouTube says it removed Jordan Peterson interview of RFK Jr. for violating vaccine policy

I don’t agree with all of RFK’s opinions, but he is free to express them and Google should not interfere . Google is free to express their own opinion in rebuttal, but to actively prevent RFK’s opinions from being heard is the stuff of dystopian novels.