Spend, spend, spend… oh, and tax!

The CBO says our debt will continue to grow over the next decade, leading to “serious negative consequences”. Really, you think so?

OK, let me put the U.S. budget crisis in terms you might understand. In the following comparison, “income” is proportional to tax revenue, “credit card debt” is proportional to national debt,

You have an immature sibling who can’t seem to handle their money. They make a cool $100K per year, but have almost  $430K in credit card (unsecured) debt (more than four times their gross income). Worse, they expect their credit card debt to increase by $18K this year alone. By 2026, their income will rise to over $150K/year, but their credit card debt will increase to $700K – and will be increasing at a rate of almost $38K per year. In other words, even if their earnings rise as projected their debt will rise at an even faster rate. You’ve been brought up with strong family bonds, and you know that you and the rest of the family will need to bail your sibling out if they get too far in debt. What kind of talk would you be having with your sibling under these circumstances? Maybe you would discuss the”serious negative consequences” of their actions…?

Now, let’s look at this from another angle: You work for your sibling’s company, where you are paid at a higher rate (and with better benefits) than market because of your familial ties. It also turns out your sibling is on the hook for any shortfall in your retirement account, so you plan on “spiking” your last year income to increase your retirement payout. You could (and should) have been replaced years ago by someone with a better work ethic, higher skills, and a lower cost, but you don’t want to give up your meal ticket. Instead, you unduly influence your sibling directly and through like-minded family members (guilt is, after all, a powerful tool). What kind of talk do you have with your sibling under these conditions? Yeah, I thought so.

Notice that that the government likes to state the national debt as a percent of GDP. Since when is your debt calculated based on the productivity of the company for which you work? Seems like some sneaky accounting trick, doesn’t it (it is)?

Welcome to the Welfare States of America, where your wealth and well being is the responsibility of the state. God save the sucker who actually works for a living (or, more correctly, for your living).

And don’t forget: It’s your own fault. You put them in office, and they’ve done exactly what you told them to do. You want something for free, and they give it to you while billing the minority of voters who didn’t contribute to their campaign coffers. Well, watch out: someday it might be you who gets stuck with the bill.

Are contributions to your own charity tax deductible?

OK – let’s see if I have this right…

According to the Clinton’s 2015 tax return, they gave a cool million to their own charity, the Clinton Family Foundation. Note that the charity watchdog organization Charity Navigator had placed the Clinton foundation on their “watchlist” of problem charities, according to a 2015 NY Post article (although this no longer appears to be the case). I wonder if the Clintons can be employed by their own charitable organization after they retire from politics? That would make their foundation a lot more like a retirement plan than a charity….

Desert Classic Charities was the other recipient of the Clinton’s generosity, receiving (by comparison, a paltry) $42,000. That very same charity is reported to have then in turn given a donation of $700,000 to the Clinton Foundation.

I’m not kidding. You can’t make this stuff up….

For all you recreational drug users…

… you might want to review this ruling:

Crose v. Humana Insurance Company

The plaintiff’s insurance policy contained the following clause:

 “Causation Exclusions . . . Loss due to being intoxicated or under the influence of any narcotic unless administered on the advice of a health care practitioner.”

In other words, if you’re high on drugs and injured as a result, your medical insurance company may be off the hook. I wonder how many people will be frantically updating their “medical marijuana” prescriptions tomorrow…

Texas voting laws vs. the World

The Texas voter ID law is once again in the news. In July, a sharply divided 5th circuit Court of Appeals ruled that while the law was not intentionally discriminatory, it could have that effect for some voters. Following this ruling, a lower court outlined additional options available for voters who might not have one of the defined acceptable identifications.

But are voter ID laws really such a burden? In the rest of the world, the requirement for presenting voter ID is widely accepted. Why, then, does the U.S. have such a problem with this concept?

Hurray for the Chicago Police Superintendent

This is the kind of action that restores the public trust:

Chicago police recommend firing of 7 cops for false reports

Lots of people go to jail when they lie to the police; when the police lie, they should go to prison. Removing their ability to wield police power, though, is a good start.

Now, let’s see how long it takes for the police union to get them reinstated (with back pay).

Ok, ok… let’s see if I’ve got this right…

The State Department now admits that a video concerning disclosures by the department’s own Jen Psaki regarding the Iran nuclear deal was altered to delete her comments. They admit that this was done by a technician, based on a phone call the technician received requesting the edit. But they don’t know who made the phone call?

State Department says review into deleted briefing footage ‘inconclusive’

Seems like we’ve got a propaganda machine operating within our government, which concerns me greatly. What ever happened to the government transparency Obama promised us?

Freedom rankings among the 50 states

From the Cato Institute, a study ranking the level of freedom available in the 50 United States. Read about their methodology and results here.

Very interesting. The low-freedom  states were as expected (New York and California came in at 50th and 49th respectively), but the high-freedom states were a surprise – at least to me. Well worth your time to review.

International gun control?

Michael Bloomberg named World Health Organization ambassador

Note that Bloomberg will be responsible for non-communicable diseases, which includes cancer, diabetes, heart and lung disease, and  – listed later in the article – “combat injuries”. Based on Bloomberg’s long history of opposing the 2nd amendment, how long do you think it will be before all gun-related deaths fall into the category of “non-communicable disease” – like “combat injuries” – and thus fall within his domain? I predict that Bloomberg will use his new post to push for international gun control.

Remember, you heard it here first.

 

A dartboard and a blindfold….

… would have worked out better:

CalPERS earned less than 1% in fiscal year

CalPERS is the defined benefit retirement system for California’s public sector employees. The problem: any shortfalls in the retirement fund is paid by – you guessed it – the citizens (remaining) in California. Doesn’t exactly help that the unions hold a substantial sway over investments. The $300B CalPERS system is currently only 68% funded (that’s an almost $100B shortfall already).

The big problem with these defined benefit systems, particularly when they are heavily union-controlled, is two-fold: 1) there is no incentive to control costs associated with pensions, such as “pension spiking“, and 2) there is substantial potential for undue influence over investments.

It is time for legislation that eliminates these public-sector defined benefit systems altogether. They should be changed into defined contribution systems where retirement funds are paid into individual retirement accounts. Or, if the union still wants to influence investments, defined contributions can be made into a union-controlled fund managed for the benefit of their members. At least then there will be incentive to invest wisely and limit pension costs…